2. ꢃꢀ∼ consists of the cells, ꢂ ∶ [ꢁ] → ꢃ such that ꢄ∗ꢂ = pt ., for any ꢄ ∶ [ꢇ] → [ꢁ]
and ꢇ < ꢁ. If ꢈ is ꢀ-reduced then any pointed map ꢈ → ꢃ factors uniquely
through ꢃꢀ∼, so ꢃꢀ∼ ↪ ꢃ is universal from ꢀ-reduced spaces to ꢃ, thus proving
the claim.
3. For ꢀ = 0, there is nothing to prove. If ꢃ is ꢀ-connected for ꢀ > 0 and ꢃꢀ∼−1 ↪ ꢃ
is a strong deformation retract, then, we may assume that ꢃ is (ꢀ − 1) reduced.
(ꢀ − 1) -cells of ꢃ are then in bijection with maps ꢀꢀ−1 → ꢃ.
The ꢀ-connectivity implies that there exists an assignment associating (ꢄ ∶ ꢀꢀ−1
ꢃ) ↦ ꢄ ∶ ꢉ → ꢃ, where ꢄ is a contraction of ꢄ. This is the underlying data
↦
ꢀ
̃
̃
determining our deformation retract up to homotopy.
If the unique map skꢀ−1ꢃ → skꢀ−1ꢃꢀ∼ has been extended to the ꢀ + ꢅ-skeleton,
ꢊꢀ+ꢅ, along with a homotopy ꢋꢀ+ꢅ ∶ id → ꢊꢀ+ꢅ, the extension of both to the
ꢀ + ꢅ + 1 skeleton constructs itself on an a non-degenerate ꢀ + ꢅ + 1-cell, ꢄ, by
extending the map
ꢄ ⨿ ꢌꢋꢀ+ꢅꢌꢄ ∶ [ꢀ]
ꢌ
ꢌ[ꢀ],ꢌ[ꢀ]×{0}[ꢀ] × [1]
to
ꢋ
ꢀ+ꢅ+1(ꢄ) ∶ [ꢀ] × 1 → ꢃ
and writing ꢊꢀ+ꢅ+1 = (id ×ꢍ0)∗(ꢋꢀ+ꢅ+1).
2