0.1 Reduction  
0.1.1  
ꢀ∗ is the category of pointed-spaces, modelled as Kan complexes along with a map  
pt . ↪ . This is often thought of as a simplicial model category and an ∞-category.  
In what follows it will suffice to think of ꢀ∗ as category and remember the definition of  
strong deformation retract in this context.  
0.1.2 ꢀ-Reduced Models  
A ꢁ-cell ꢂ ∈ ꢃꢁ in a pointed space ꢃ is called ꢀ-reduced if ꢄ∗ꢂ = pt for any ꢄ ∶  
[ꢅ] → [ꢁ], with ꢅ < ꢀ. A pointed space, , is called ꢀ-reduced if every cell of is  
ꢀ-reduced: equivalently, if ꢅ = pt . for 0 ≤ ꢅ < ꢀ. An ꢀ-reduced model for a space ꢃ  
is an ꢀ-reduced Kan complex, ꢃꢀ∼ along with an equivalence:  
ꢃꢀ∼ ≅ ꢃ  
Proposition 0.0.1.  
1. A space admits an ꢀ-reduced model if and only if it is ꢀ-  
connected.  
2. There is a co-reflection ꢆ ∶ {ꢀ-reduced spaces} → ꢀ∗ ∶ ∙∼ ∶, where ꢆ is the  
ꢀ
forgetful functor.  
3. We have ꢆꢀ∼ = id and the counit  
ꢃꢀ∼ → ꢃ  
is a strong deformation retract of ꢃ, whenever ꢃ is ꢀ-connected.  
Proof.  
1. ꢀ-reduced spaces admit non-trivial maps from ꢀꢅ, for ꢅ < ꢀ, so are ꢀ-  
connected. (2) and (3) imply the converse of (1).  
1
2. ꢃꢀ∼ consists of the cells, ꢂ ∶ [ꢁ] → ꢃ such that ꢄ∗ꢂ = pt ., for any ꢄ ∶ [ꢇ] → [ꢁ]  
and ꢇ < ꢁ. If ꢈ is ꢀ-reduced then any pointed map ꢈ → ꢃ factors uniquely  
through ꢃꢀ∼, so ꢃꢀ∼ ↪ ꢃ is universal from ꢀ-reduced spaces to ꢃ, thus proving  
the claim.  
3. For ꢀ = 0, there is nothing to prove. If ꢃ is ꢀ-connected for ꢀ > 0 and ꢃꢀ∼−1 ↪ ꢃ  
is a strong deformation retract, then, we may assume that ꢃ is (ꢀ − 1) reduced.  
(ꢀ − 1) -cells of ꢃ are then in bijection with maps ꢀꢀ−1 → ꢃ.  
The ꢀ-connectivity implies that there exists an assignment associating (ꢄ ∶ ꢀꢀ−1  
ꢃ) ↦ ꢄ ∶ ꢉ → ꢃ, where ꢄ is a contraction of ꢄ. This is the underlying data  
↦
ꢀ
̃
̃
determining our deformation retract up to homotopy.  
If the unique map skꢀ−1ꢃ → skꢀ−1ꢃꢀ∼ has been extended to the ꢀ + ꢅ-skeleton,  
ꢊꢀ+ꢅ, along with a homotopy ꢋꢀ+ꢅ ∶ id → ꢊꢀ+ꢅ, the extension of both to the  
ꢀ + ꢅ + 1 skeleton constructs itself on an a non-degenerate ꢀ + ꢅ + 1-cell, ꢄ, by  
extending the map  
ꢄ ⨿ ꢌꢋꢀ+ꢅꢌꢄ ∶ [ꢀ]  
ꢌ
ꢌ[ꢀ],ꢌ[ꢀ]×{0}[ꢀ] × [1]  
to  
ꢋ
ꢀ+ꢅ+1(ꢄ) ∶ [ꢀ] × 1 → ꢃ  
and writing ꢊꢀ+ꢅ+1 = (id ×ꢍ0)∗(ꢋꢀ+ꢅ+1).  
2